In what should come as a surprise to literally no one at all, the College Sports Commission has discovered that several programs, including an unnamed 10 Power Four programs, have violated the NIL spending cap by going around the backdoor and working with third party vendors to boost their revenue sharing agreements.
Any money a student-athlete receives from a third-party must clear the CSC approval process, where it’s examined to see if the deal meets a fair-market range of compensation. In July, the CSC amended its rules to exempt all deals between $600 and $15,000 from the range of compensation review as long as that athlete has made $50,000 or less in “associated” deals. If the athlete is above that $50,000 number, the review is back in effect.
With seven college football rosters ballooning into $40 and, in a few cases, $50 million range, according to previous CBS Sports reporting, schools are spending well beyond the rev share number, which is meant to serve for all sports. Given $40 million football rosters and $10-million-plus basketball rosters just to be competitive, schools are attempting to generate tens of millions in third-party money for their athletes just to remain competitive. There is no cap on how much a team can spend as long as the deals are submitted and approved as being in accordance with the fair market range of compensation through the CSC’s process.
In September, the CSC reported that through its platform NIL GO it had cleared $227.25 million in deals between July 1 and Aug. 31. However, it failed to clear $67.08 million during that period in deals that did not meet fair-market-value standards or the terms of the House Settlement agreement.
While the article doesn’t name anyone in particular, one program unsurprisingly rose to the top of the media outlets as being a guilty party:

As word would have it, Marcel Reed’s 2.8 million dollar NIL deal was brokered and listed as part of the athletic department’s “agricultural equipment” budget.
It’s kind of like we’ve welcomed the mafia into college football, not only from the betting sense with gambling site ads all over the games and even on ESPN, but to allowing people like Al Capone and his famed accountant to cook the books to make programs richer.
And the better question, once it’s discovered who these teams are, is what are the results? If a team gets busted for violating the spending cap and doesn’t have the results to show for it, what was it all for?
One guess I have, and I’m no expert here, is that Kirby Smart and the UGAAA aren’t going to be named as a party of guilt in this matter. And I appreciate that, for sure.


