Bleeding Talent

Shot:

Screenshot

Chaser:

Screenshot

The first isn’t that shocking until you see the second. As we are nearing the close of the portal, some SEC teams are negative in returning talent by double digits. A few are either breaking even or in the positive.

The two fanbases who are taking this the worst? That’s be Tennessee and Alabama, especially after Alabama lost the bidding war for Cam Coleman’s services to Texas (shocker).

In other news…Texas is back!

18 thoughts on “Bleeding Talent

    • That has to be true eventually, right? I bet a lot of us (myself included) thought that the facilities “arms race” couldn’t last. Or the ever-increasing coaching contracts and buyouts. The money has to run out sooner or later…doesn’t it?

  1. The sum being negative shows coaches use the portal to jettison unwanted players. Once the pain of losing valued players a greater than the need for a way to cut dead wood the coaches will drive change.

  2. So far, we have been pretty good at retaining the ones we want even if it hurts our depth; however, only fair at obtaining superior talent, Branch being the exception

  3. The question on the portal always is not whether you are net “positive” on raw numbers. It’s whether you upgraded your talent.

    With Georgia, I look at it and ask the question, “Does this guy we brought in upgrade our talent?” I measure that by whether he is a better player than the best player in the position group we lost.

    Let’s use #3 as an example. Can you find a better RB than him in the portal (and that isn’t about quantity)? The other question is whether the NIL deal makes sense. If I think I have similar (but possibly unproven) talent already on the roster at a lower NIL deal, I’m ok with the decision. By the way, don’t take this as my opinion on Nate as a player or teammate … he seems to be awesome at both.

    • Thought the same thing, need that piece of the equation also, thanks for the link!

  4. I think the lists read…New coaches, then Coaches in desperate need of help, then Kirby.

Comments are closed.